alterego
07-25 09:33 PM
You EAD or AP may be approved at anytime while your 485 is pending, it is a derivative benefit of the pending 485 petition. If the 140 is rejected then everything collapses like a stack of dominos.
wallpaper Dorothy Hamill#39;s hair
Lmason
08-02 05:44 AM
i like it
devikas81
09-19 11:46 AM
I am on similar situation like you....
after usinig EAD with different employer other than GC sponser, can we come back to H1B again,
Your answer will be highly appreciated,
Thanks,
after usinig EAD with different employer other than GC sponser, can we come back to H1B again,
Your answer will be highly appreciated,
Thanks,
2011 I loved Dorothy Hamill,
Blog Feeds
08-31 11:30 AM
A lot of nice tributes to Senator Kennedy recognizing his immigration achievements. Here are a few: Ted Kennedy's Greatest Accomplishment: He Created Americans - Dana Houle of Daily Kos talks about Kennedy's shepherding through the 1965 Immigration Act. From HIAS. From the National Immigration Forum. From the American Immigration Lawyers Association. From the Immigration Policy Center. From the Migration Policy Institute. Partha Banerjee in the McClatchy News Service And here is a speech Senator Kennedy gave in 2006 promoting his immigration reform bill:
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/tributes-to-kennedy-pour-in-from-proimmigration-community.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/tributes-to-kennedy-pour-in-from-proimmigration-community.html)
more...
Macaca
04-27 09:43 AM
Sen. Luddite Strikes Again (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602257.html) -- Once more, a mystery Republican blocks electronic filing for Senate candidates, Friday, April 27, 2007
JUST AS she did on April 17, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) went to the Senate floor to call for unanimous consent on a common-sense bill that would require candidates to file their campaign finance reports electronically. And just as he or she did on April 17, Sen. Ima Luddite (R-Who Knows Where) voiced opposition. This time the mouthpiece was Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). "On behalf of the Republican side," he said, "I object." We object to the obstruction.
Honestly, what is the big deal here? Filing campaign finance reports electronically has been standard operating procedure for candidates for the House of Representatives and the White House for years -- as it has been for political parties, political action committees and "527" groups. Yet Senate candidates are still trudging down to the Senate Office of Public Records with paper copies of their reports, which are then passed along to the Federal Election Commission, which sends them to a vendor that punches in the information and zaps it back to the FEC electronically. That finally makes them widely available, sometimes too late for voters to see who's donating to whom and how the money is being spent. With this seeming fear of modernity, it's a wonder the Senate isn't calculating budgets with an abacus. Or is it a fear of disclosure?
After the bill was blocked, Ms. Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, said, "It is very hard for me to understand who could oppose this and what their reason for opposing it could be." It is very hard for us, too. Sen. Luddite -- whoever he or she may be -- should come out of the shadows and explain the irrational fear that is keeping the Senate from joining the rest of us in the 21st century. Senator anonymous -- Another Day, Another Hold On Finance Bill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602249.html) By Matthew Mosk (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/matthew+mosk/), Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, April 27, 2007
Sen. Anonymous struck again yesterday.
The infamous unnamed senator (or senators) has for more than a week blocked passage of legislation that would require Senate candidates to file campaign finance reports electronically.
Electronic filings would make the names of campaign donors readily available -- it's how members of the House and presidential candidates have been doing it for years. When Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) first brought the bill to the floor last week, though, he was told that an unnamed lawmaker objected.
Long-standing Senate custom allows the objection of a single senator to stop a bill in its tracks -- it's known as a secret hold. A measure that passed the Senate earlier this year, and awaits a House vote, would eliminate the practice.
The hold unleashed a torrent of activity on the Internet, as bloggers tried to flush out the identity of the senator responsible for the hold. But after an onslaught of phone calls to Senate offices, the bloggers have no answer. No one owned up to being the culprit.
Yesterday, the bill's sponsor tried again. And again, the Republican floor leader objected. A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said he is sure the name of the secret senator is known "in the cloakroom," but he said that misses the point.
"A hold can't stop something from coming to the floor," Don Stewart said. "It can only stop it from being pushed through without a full and open debate on the bill."
That's true -- sponsors had been trying to pass the bill by unanimous consent, which does not permit amendment or debate. But Feingold told the liberal blog Daily Kos that the path was typical for a bill with 35 bipartisan co-sponsors that did not elicit a single objection in committee.
Writing on the blog yesterday, Feingold said: "The fact is that someone anonymously blocked the bill, . . . that person has made no effort to resolve his or her concerns with us, and the Republican leadership won't even tell us who that person is."
JUST AS she did on April 17, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) went to the Senate floor to call for unanimous consent on a common-sense bill that would require candidates to file their campaign finance reports electronically. And just as he or she did on April 17, Sen. Ima Luddite (R-Who Knows Where) voiced opposition. This time the mouthpiece was Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). "On behalf of the Republican side," he said, "I object." We object to the obstruction.
Honestly, what is the big deal here? Filing campaign finance reports electronically has been standard operating procedure for candidates for the House of Representatives and the White House for years -- as it has been for political parties, political action committees and "527" groups. Yet Senate candidates are still trudging down to the Senate Office of Public Records with paper copies of their reports, which are then passed along to the Federal Election Commission, which sends them to a vendor that punches in the information and zaps it back to the FEC electronically. That finally makes them widely available, sometimes too late for voters to see who's donating to whom and how the money is being spent. With this seeming fear of modernity, it's a wonder the Senate isn't calculating budgets with an abacus. Or is it a fear of disclosure?
After the bill was blocked, Ms. Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, said, "It is very hard for me to understand who could oppose this and what their reason for opposing it could be." It is very hard for us, too. Sen. Luddite -- whoever he or she may be -- should come out of the shadows and explain the irrational fear that is keeping the Senate from joining the rest of us in the 21st century. Senator anonymous -- Another Day, Another Hold On Finance Bill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042602249.html) By Matthew Mosk (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/matthew+mosk/), Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, April 27, 2007
Sen. Anonymous struck again yesterday.
The infamous unnamed senator (or senators) has for more than a week blocked passage of legislation that would require Senate candidates to file campaign finance reports electronically.
Electronic filings would make the names of campaign donors readily available -- it's how members of the House and presidential candidates have been doing it for years. When Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) first brought the bill to the floor last week, though, he was told that an unnamed lawmaker objected.
Long-standing Senate custom allows the objection of a single senator to stop a bill in its tracks -- it's known as a secret hold. A measure that passed the Senate earlier this year, and awaits a House vote, would eliminate the practice.
The hold unleashed a torrent of activity on the Internet, as bloggers tried to flush out the identity of the senator responsible for the hold. But after an onslaught of phone calls to Senate offices, the bloggers have no answer. No one owned up to being the culprit.
Yesterday, the bill's sponsor tried again. And again, the Republican floor leader objected. A spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said he is sure the name of the secret senator is known "in the cloakroom," but he said that misses the point.
"A hold can't stop something from coming to the floor," Don Stewart said. "It can only stop it from being pushed through without a full and open debate on the bill."
That's true -- sponsors had been trying to pass the bill by unanimous consent, which does not permit amendment or debate. But Feingold told the liberal blog Daily Kos that the path was typical for a bill with 35 bipartisan co-sponsors that did not elicit a single objection in committee.
Writing on the blog yesterday, Feingold said: "The fact is that someone anonymously blocked the bill, . . . that person has made no effort to resolve his or her concerns with us, and the Republican leadership won't even tell us who that person is."
dohko
03-06 02:21 PM
Can I count part time experience obtained before my Bachelors degree for an EB2 petition?
I have 2.5 years of part time experience, can we use this and apply with MBA+1 requirements?
Thanks
I have 2.5 years of part time experience, can we use this and apply with MBA+1 requirements?
Thanks
more...
ponnam
12-08 08:33 PM
Hi All,
I have a question regarding my wife's H1B Status.
My wife got H1B stamped in hyderabad consulate last year. Due to recession, she applied for H4 to join me in US, got H4 stamping in hyderabad, during which
H1 Visa was cancelled[expected..]. we have H1B Petition docs which says it is valid for 3 years. My wife came to US on H4.
Now can't she apply for Change of status from H4 to H1 as we have petition docs, which are valid for 3 years?
when contacted the actual employer, they said, when H1 visa is cancelled, it means, H1B petition also cancelled. Is it true?
Please suggest.
Thanks for your time.
- Ponnam.
I have a question regarding my wife's H1B Status.
My wife got H1B stamped in hyderabad consulate last year. Due to recession, she applied for H4 to join me in US, got H4 stamping in hyderabad, during which
H1 Visa was cancelled[expected..]. we have H1B Petition docs which says it is valid for 3 years. My wife came to US on H4.
Now can't she apply for Change of status from H4 to H1 as we have petition docs, which are valid for 3 years?
when contacted the actual employer, they said, when H1 visa is cancelled, it means, H1B petition also cancelled. Is it true?
Please suggest.
Thanks for your time.
- Ponnam.
2010 a #39;Dorothy Hamill#39; haircut
bodhi_tree
02-26 10:17 AM
Hello,
I have read in the popular immigration forums that one can request a one time 3 year extension to H1b beyond the standard 6 year limit if one has an approved I140 and could not file I485 due to retrogression. I am confused on how does one go about requesting this..meaning is it sufficient to just put three years under the 'date of intended employment' in I129 form and have a labor condition approval with similar dates or do you have to include a copy of approved I140 and point to the 2005 Aytes memo that grants such a provision while you file for I129. By the way the situation is also a bit more complicated due to the fact that I am changing jobs (5th year H1) and trying to get a 3 year transfer based on approval from the company I am leaving.
Appreciate your inputs
I have read in the popular immigration forums that one can request a one time 3 year extension to H1b beyond the standard 6 year limit if one has an approved I140 and could not file I485 due to retrogression. I am confused on how does one go about requesting this..meaning is it sufficient to just put three years under the 'date of intended employment' in I129 form and have a labor condition approval with similar dates or do you have to include a copy of approved I140 and point to the 2005 Aytes memo that grants such a provision while you file for I129. By the way the situation is also a bit more complicated due to the fact that I am changing jobs (5th year H1) and trying to get a 3 year transfer based on approval from the company I am leaving.
Appreciate your inputs
more...
Templarian
09-21 01:10 PM
:beam:
hair dorothy hamill hairstyle
purgan
09-11 07:15 PM
IV:
Please note the following meeting:
http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2006_09_14/2006_09_14.html
Committee: Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Title: Employment-Based Permanent Immigration: Examining the Value of a Skills Based Point System
Date: Thursday, September 14, 10:30 AM
Place: Dirksen 430
Please note the following meeting:
http://help.senate.gov/Hearings/2006_09_14/2006_09_14.html
Committee: Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Title: Employment-Based Permanent Immigration: Examining the Value of a Skills Based Point System
Date: Thursday, September 14, 10:30 AM
Place: Dirksen 430
more...
RNGC
02-10 09:57 AM
How can we help ourselves to get 2 year AP ? IV admins, can you kindly share with us any info regarding this ?
I know at this moment everyone is looking at the stimulus plan and economy, but , in the mean time we can prepare ourselves with some plan of action...
May be we should push for 3 year EAD/AP . Our argument should be, if we are 3 or more years away ( like EB3 India is currently 2001 or something ), we should get 3 year EAD/AP
Not meant to talk only for EB3 community, but in general as well.
Any thoughts IVians ?
I know at this moment everyone is looking at the stimulus plan and economy, but , in the mean time we can prepare ourselves with some plan of action...
May be we should push for 3 year EAD/AP . Our argument should be, if we are 3 or more years away ( like EB3 India is currently 2001 or something ), we should get 3 year EAD/AP
Not meant to talk only for EB3 community, but in general as well.
Any thoughts IVians ?
hot dorothy hamill hairstyle
Dhundhun
06-16 05:23 PM
I started my life on EAD. So wanted to have some business card as well. Any guidelines for -
Business name:
Position:
This is to keep some professional expenses seperate, if possible to be used for tax filing.
Business name:
Position:
This is to keep some professional expenses seperate, if possible to be used for tax filing.
more...
house Dorothy Hamill at her home
pani_6
07-23 07:49 PM
I am applying to renew my EAD and looking at the paper Application on page 7 I see that if you are C9 which all of us are mostly..we need not file an application fee..
Is it true..
Plz help
Is it true..
Plz help
tattoo skater, Dorothy Hamill.
atlgc
04-23 03:21 PM
Hello
I am EB3 and recently got my h1-b extension from 10th to 13 year and got approved without any RFE in 2months from VSC.approved in 3rd week of january.i am working for the same company since 2002 an I am permanent employee not consultant and no clients
Now all the sudden out of nowhere an immigration inspector came to our workplace and asked details about my work, salary. They didn't ask anything else. They asked about me but I was working from home that day an per hr its related to h1-b but they have no clue as i am the only one non immigrant in 1600 employees
Is this common?
Should I enquiry with uscis? If so how
Since I worked from home that day and didn�t meet me, will there be an issue?
Should I be concerned anything or just forget about it. Any of your experiences thoughts are much advised
thanks
I am EB3 and recently got my h1-b extension from 10th to 13 year and got approved without any RFE in 2months from VSC.approved in 3rd week of january.i am working for the same company since 2002 an I am permanent employee not consultant and no clients
Now all the sudden out of nowhere an immigration inspector came to our workplace and asked details about my work, salary. They didn't ask anything else. They asked about me but I was working from home that day an per hr its related to h1-b but they have no clue as i am the only one non immigrant in 1600 employees
Is this common?
Should I enquiry with uscis? If so how
Since I worked from home that day and didn�t meet me, will there be an issue?
Should I be concerned anything or just forget about it. Any of your experiences thoughts are much advised
thanks
more...
pictures EXCLUSIVE: Dorothy Hamill says
reachtoravi
01-17 02:45 PM
I want to change my recurring contribution to my new shining miles card ...
is there an easy way to do this ??
is there an easy way to do this ??
dresses Dorothy Hamill Hairstyle -
maash10
08-11 04:51 PM
bump
more...
makeup Dorothy Hamill
cosh1b2
04-05 04:23 PM
I had been in H-1B status and was laid off. My H-1B was withdrawn by my company on 12/31/2010. I applied for COS to B2 and received the USCIS receipt notice on Dec 17th, a few days before my H-1B was withdrawn.
Later on Feb 2nd, 2011, I received the approval notice from USCIS for B2 valid from 02/02/2011 to 04/29/2011(I had informed in my application that this would be my date of departure.) My question is: What status would I be from the date my H-1B was withdrawn till the B2 validity start date?
Forum members, please clarify.
Thanks
Later on Feb 2nd, 2011, I received the approval notice from USCIS for B2 valid from 02/02/2011 to 04/29/2011(I had informed in my application that this would be my date of departure.) My question is: What status would I be from the date my H-1B was withdrawn till the B2 validity start date?
Forum members, please clarify.
Thanks
girlfriend like Dorothy Hamill,
cagedcactus
11-19 02:18 PM
I just checked that Nebraska is now processing cases from August 2007 for I 140 applications. Do these also indicate China and India?
My pd for I 140 is in July, and I am from india. Should I be able to make a query since the dates have gone past my PD?
thanks for any info....
My pd for I 140 is in July, and I am from india. Should I be able to make a query since the dates have gone past my PD?
thanks for any info....
hairstyles Dorothy Hamill Hairstyles 2011
joeglen3
08-08 11:10 PM
My I-140 was approved April 30,2007. The appoval letter indicated that not yet elligible for change of status. The I-485 was returned together with the checks we paid. Please clarify and what can I do next other than waiting?
pa_arora
02-08 05:58 PM
Does anyone knows, what can be done to expedite the AP processing??
Thanks for the inputs.
-p
Thanks for the inputs.
-p
Joey Foley
August 29th, 2005, 04:56 PM
I just posted a ton of photos
Just thought you might want to check out a few photos I took of Green Day (direct link below).
I kind of went over and posted too many (67) .
Check'em out!
I'm also taken photo in Indy of them.
http://www.musicandentertainment.org/cpg133/thumbnails.php?album=36
Anything you like in there? Let me know.
I only had one lens with me that night my canon 70-200mm 2.8L
I'm not really used to shooting shows with just that lens, but I think I got a couple of keepers (well I think):o
Just thought you might want to check out a few photos I took of Green Day (direct link below).
I kind of went over and posted too many (67) .
Check'em out!
I'm also taken photo in Indy of them.
http://www.musicandentertainment.org/cpg133/thumbnails.php?album=36
Anything you like in there? Let me know.
I only had one lens with me that night my canon 70-200mm 2.8L
I'm not really used to shooting shows with just that lens, but I think I got a couple of keepers (well I think):o
No comments:
Post a Comment